Zizek's take on "Christian Atheism" (humanism) as the enemy of "Western Buddhism" (cynicism and nihilism) is a good direction to take, once something is shed of their symbolic veneer do you really see ideas as themselves, being more timeless than expected. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCdM_jGdLI4
> FIELDS THAT SURVIVE BASED ON HUMAN IRRATIONALITY
Also, I forgot the quote that is the equivalent of "all good communities are unique in their own way, but all bad communities behave the same", and that "all good people behave the same, all bad people behave horrible in their own unique way". Due to the horribleness of subpar individuals, collaboration require homogenization or rendered to be like the same. For proper individuals, diversity is an inherent good.
> CAN ATHEISM JUSTIFY HUMAN RIGHTS?
Zizek's take on "Christian Atheism" (humanism) as the enemy of "Western Buddhism" (cynicism and nihilism) is a good direction to take, once something is shed of their symbolic veneer do you really see ideas as themselves, being more timeless than expected. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCdM_jGdLI4
> FIELDS THAT SURVIVE BASED ON HUMAN IRRATIONALITY
Hanson's Razor: Never attribute to stupidity what is adequately explained by unconscious selfishness (AKA primal or pragmatic need for survival). A clear derivation of this principle is "Irrational positions are usually rational signaling devices." https://bluntobject.wordpress.com/2011/02/26/hansons-razor/ http://www.isegoria.net/2011/03/hanson%E2%80%99s-razor/
Also, I forgot the quote that is the equivalent of "all good communities are unique in their own way, but all bad communities behave the same", and that "all good people behave the same, all bad people behave horrible in their own unique way". Due to the horribleness of subpar individuals, collaboration require homogenization or rendered to be like the same. For proper individuals, diversity is an inherent good.